<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Just a Gwai Lo</title>
  <subtitle>fun within prescribed limits</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://justagwailo.com/filter/2004/07/14/hitchens"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://justagwailo.com/node/3658/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://justagwailo.com/node/3658/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-01-26T01:10:52-08:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Opposed To So Many of His Cherished Principles</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://justagwailo.com/filter/2004/07/14/hitchens" />
    <id>http://justagwailo.com/filter/2004/07/14/hitchens</id>
    <published>2004-07-14T19:31:04-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-01-26T01:10:52-08:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Richard</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Christopher Hitchens" />
    <category term="Filter" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a title="Coming to Terms With Christopher Hitchens on Iraq" href="http://blog.mmadsen.org/blog/files/madsen2004comingtotermshitchens.pdf">Mark E. Madsen</a> [PDF]: <span class="q">&ldquo;long-time readers deserve an explanation from [Christopher] Hitchens as to why his analysis of the administration seems muted at best.  Other than the Iraq poilcy he clearly favors, is he really willing to overlook the many ways in which their ideology and policies stand opposed to so many of his cherished principles.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Madsen has written an excellent essay on the recent writings of Christopher Hitchens, and while the former understands that the latter's conviction of the necessity to remove Saddam Hussein is genuine and fits with Hitchens' principles, Madsen says that Hitchens is overlooking exactly the type of thing (clerical barbarism and attacks on civil rights) at home that he vilifies abroad.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a title="Coming to Terms With Christopher Hitchens on Iraq" href="http://blog.mmadsen.org/blog/files/madsen2004comingtotermshitchens.pdf">Mark E. Madsen</a> [PDF]: <span class="q">&ldquo;long-time readers deserve an explanation from [Christopher] Hitchens as to why his analysis of the administration seems muted at best.  Other than the Iraq poilcy he clearly favors, is he really willing to overlook the many ways in which their ideology and policies stand opposed to so many of his cherished principles.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Madsen has written an excellent essay on the recent writings of Christopher Hitchens, and while the former understands that the latter's conviction of the necessity to remove Saddam Hussein is genuine and fits with Hitchens' principles, Madsen says that Hitchens is overlooking exactly the type of thing (clerical barbarism and attacks on civil rights) at home that he vilifies abroad.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
