<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Just a Gwai Lo</title>
  <subtitle>fun within prescribed limits</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://justagwailo.com/filter/2005/03/19/outsiders"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://justagwailo.com/node/4058/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://justagwailo.com/node/4058/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-03-19T07:30:04-07:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Without Any Specialized Knowledge</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://justagwailo.com/filter/2005/03/19/outsiders" />
    <id>http://justagwailo.com/filter/2005/03/19/outsiders</id>
    <published>2005-03-19T13:25:40-08:00</published>
    <updated>2007-03-19T07:30:04-07:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Richard</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Filter" />
    <category term="blogging" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.makikoitoh.com/archives/2005/03/19/not_in.php">Maki</a>: <span class="q">&ldquo;Growing up, I've always been one of the "other": not white, not "really" American, not even African American, not a man, certainly not Swiss, and not even "really" Japanese. Therefore, I suppose that my tolerence level for being excluded, intentionally or not, is rather high. Now, I admit that I used to care a lot more about this, and so I pushed myself to participate a lot more in the mainstream of at least the Web Design Community. Nowadays because my focus has changed, both professionally and personally, I don't care nearly as much, and I write whatever I feel like, especially on this site. I can certainly understand the frustration of feeling excluded from something. Nevertheless, I can't help feeling uncomfortable with the sometimes strident clamour about these issues, and for creating more and more groups and subgroups of "what's in" as defined by a few.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Maki is talking about <a href="http://www.justagwailo.com/filter/2005/03/16/dark-web">articles suggesting that men dominate blogging</a> and points to <a href="http://www.rebeccablood.net/archive/2005/03.html#18men">Rebecca Blood's notes about actual research showing that if men make up a majority of bloggers, it is a bare majority</a>.  Maki writes more about being an outsider in general, and as <a href="http://www.cfmc.com/adamb/sabr/inout.htm">Bill James writes about 'inside baseball'</a>, it's not necessarily better being an insider or an outsider, but different.  It's probably a fair statement that a large minority (possibly even a majority) of bloggers are outsiders to the subjects they discuss.  I certainly include myself in that group, talking about <a href="http://www.justagwailo.com/filter/2005/03/19/grime">grime</a> or <a href="http://www.justagwailo.com/filter/category/dating/">dating</a> without any specialized knowledge of or without much experience in the subject.  That doesn't stop me, and nor should it, really.  I have opinions on things just like everybody else does, and they are reflected more in what I point to than what I actually come out and say, because it's easier for me to let people call bullshit on them than it is to let people call bullshit on me.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.makikoitoh.com/archives/2005/03/19/not_in.php">Maki</a>: <span class="q">&ldquo;Growing up, I've always been one of the "other": not white, not "really" American, not even African American, not a man, certainly not Swiss, and not even "really" Japanese. Therefore, I suppose that my tolerence level for being excluded, intentionally or not, is rather high. Now, I admit that I used to care a lot more about this, and so I pushed myself to participate a lot more in the mainstream of at least the Web Design Community. Nowadays because my focus has changed, both professionally and personally, I don't care nearly as much, and I write whatever I feel like, especially on this site. I can certainly understand the frustration of feeling excluded from something. Nevertheless, I can't help feeling uncomfortable with the sometimes strident clamour about these issues, and for creating more and more groups and subgroups of "what's in" as defined by a few.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p>Maki is talking about <a href="http://www.justagwailo.com/filter/2005/03/16/dark-web">articles suggesting that men dominate blogging</a> and points to <a href="http://www.rebeccablood.net/archive/2005/03.html#18men">Rebecca Blood's notes about actual research showing that if men make up a majority of bloggers, it is a bare majority</a>.  Maki writes more about being an outsider in general, and as <a href="http://www.cfmc.com/adamb/sabr/inout.htm">Bill James writes about 'inside baseball'</a>, it's not necessarily better being an insider or an outsider, but different.  It's probably a fair statement that a large minority (possibly even a majority) of bloggers are outsiders to the subjects they discuss.  I certainly include myself in that group, talking about <a href="http://www.justagwailo.com/filter/2005/03/19/grime">grime</a> or <a href="http://www.justagwailo.com/filter/category/dating/">dating</a> without any specialized knowledge of or without much experience in the subject.  That doesn't stop me, and nor should it, really.  I have opinions on things just like everybody else does, and they are reflected more in what I point to than what I actually come out and say, because it's easier for me to let people call bullshit on them than it is to let people call bullshit on me.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
