cherry blossoms

Ideal Conditions for Promoting Abortion

January 29th, 2006

Garry Wills (reviewing Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis by Jimmy Carter): “the anti-life movement that calls itself pro-life protects ignorance by opposing family planning, sex education, and informed use of contraceptives, tactics that not only increase the likelihood of abortion but tragedies like AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. The rigid system of the "pro-life" movement makes poverty harsher as well, with low minimum wages, opposition to maternity leaves, and lack of health services and insurance. In combination, these policies make ideal conditions for promoting abortion, as one can see from the contrast with countries that do have sex education and medical insurance.”

An Invisible High-Five to the Christian Right

October 11th, 2004

Timothy Noah on George W. Bush's anti-Dred Scott rant: “What was the meaning of this borderline-incoherent ramble? Apparently, it was an invisible high-five to the Christian right. "Google Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade," various readers instructed me, and damned if they weren't on to something. To the Christian right, "Dred Scott" turns out to be a code word for "Roe v. Wade." Even while stating as plain as day that he would apply "no litmus test," Bush was semaphoring to hard-core abortion opponents that he would indeed apply one crucial litmus test: He would never, ever, appoint a Supreme Court justice who condoned Roe.”

For an argument that the Supreme Court should not have taken on Roe v. Wade on as a case in the first place, see Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights, and Good for America by Jonathan Rauch. He says that the states should have experimented with abortion laws before having a national policy on it, just as the states should decide gay marriage law before the Supreme Court does.

Untitled

October 31st, 2003
  • Tim Bray: “Every time I open the pages, I get a little thrill at the thought that I'm reading words written two and a half millenia ago.” I've been getting the same thrill, having read a few "classics" for class. And this after thinking that reading the classics was a waste of time, since we're swimming in a Western culture that constantly references it. Bray is talking about Herodotus, and I think I prefered Thucydides, both in style and content. Bray talks in the end about Herodotus that it's tempting to draw parallels to current events, but that it doesn't have much mileage. Worth checking out if you want a brief taste of one of the classics.
  • George Lakoff argues that liberals and progressives have to change how they frame the debate. I'll admit to being seduced by the rhetoric of conservatism (a few years of reading The National Post, especially in its early days, was all it took). My dad is reporting some success in changing the culture of responses to industrial accidents: instead of emphazing that safety is a good thing—when companies hear, coming from a union, that safety is a good thing, the companies start to wonder as to the ulterior motive of the unions—my dad is trying to popularize the slogan "unsafe is unacceptable", unacceptable to all involved.
  • But She's a Girl links to a program to get your life back into balance.
  • Why Your Wife Won't Have Sex With You: who knew there was so much to talk about on that subject?
  • There's no "birth" in partial-birth abortions. This applies to all polls: “I'd like to know how many of the people who answered that question understood exactly what they were being asked about.”

Abortions For All!

October 23rd, 2003

Barbara Kay on T-shirts with political slogans:

T-shirt messaging is such an efficient communications shortcut that I was halfway to thinking these were my kind of people, when the more attractive and dominant of the two women said: "... and the first thing I ask anyone I date is if they are pro-choice. If he is, great. If not, out he goes ... ." This statement was accompanied by an air-shovelling gesture, a pantomime of the hapless pro-life suitor's swift ejection into the void. The others nodded endorsement for her policy.

She was eavesdropping on a conversation in a public place, which, if I'm not reading a book or, far rarer, having a conversation with someone, is something I do all the time on the bus. It's hard, though, because for me to be able to listen in closely, I have to be maintaining eye contact, and maintaining eye contact is a pretty obvious signal that you're eavesdropping.

In the next paragraph, she makes a good point and then makes a very bad one.

At that point they were no longer my kind of people at all, but the very opposite: dogmatic ideologues resisting compromise on a divisive social issue. I wondered if, when she isn't campaigning against casinos, Ms. Pro-Abortion ("choice" doesn't cut it for me) wears her other opinions on her sleeve, chest or back. Given the militancy on abortion that I overheard, it's quite likely that she has an entire "issues" wardrobe.

Emphasis added. Sorry, nobody other than the criminally insane is "pro-abortion", which (at least to me) means one favours aborting every pregnancy. It's like that bit on The Simpsons, when Kang, the alien, took the form of Bob Dole in the 1996 Presidential election:

Abortions for all! [crowd boos]
Very well, abortions for none! [crowd boos]
Abortions for some, miniature American flags for others! [crowd cheers]

So anyway, that little bit ruined an otherwise good article on how political slogan t-shirts discourage dissent rather than encourage it.

It's Not My Choice Linkdump

February 22nd, 2003

Clearing out bookmarks (most-recently-read links at top; post gets moved to top as it gets updated):